Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Loeb vs Emina Bektas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Bektas analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Emina Bektas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loeb 5 - 2 Bektas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 46.95% of points on their second serve, while Bektas has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 54.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bektas has won 51.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.01% and 34.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 55.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bektas has saved 53.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 45.61% of matches played (W/L 26/ 31), with Bektas winning 62.9% (W/L 39/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17). Bektas has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.17% of matches (W/L 25/ 28), where as Bektas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Loeb winning 5 times and Bektas being victorious 2 times. They have played 16 sets in total, with Loeb winning 11 and Bektas winning 5. The last match between Loeb and Bektas was at the W25 Malibu, 07-01-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-3 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Bektas have played a deciding set 2 times, with Loeb winning 1 times and Bektas 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 1, and Bektas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.82 while Bektas has played against players with an average rank of 230.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bektas has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 45.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bektas has converted 42.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
305
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
5
Total2
2
Hard2
2
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
96
Rank
82
High
31
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
54% (295-248)
Career Total W/L
59% (249-172)
50% (15-15)
YTD W/L
56% (15-12)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$210,547
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Emina Bektas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 5 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 11 | 5 |
| Games Won | 86 | 65 |
| Aces (Total) | 55 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 29 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:8 | 1:39:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (249/499) | 67% (329/493) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (190/249) | 61% (202/329) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (122/250) | 48% (79/164) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 51% (27/53) | 31% (15/48) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (212/493) | 37% (187/499) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (5/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emina Bektas
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emina Bektas
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
21
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
91%
(
40 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emina Bektas
35%
(
31 of
89)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emina Bektas
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emina Bektas
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Jamie Loeb
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
52%
(
59 of
114)
7
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
43 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
120
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Emina Bektas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (15/15) | 56% (15/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (38/34) | 54% (33/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (341/318) | 52% (302/284) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 38% (5/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 83% (10/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 158 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 118 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:10 | 1:24:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.9 | 258.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1151/2087) | 69% (1150/1675) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (763/1151) | 68% (783/1150) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (439/935) | 49% (256/525) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (115/252) | 42% (73/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (954/2151) | 40% (685/1708) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (15/14) | 70% (14/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (15/29) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 80% (8/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
4
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
11
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Emina Bektas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Emina Bektas
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
8
Aces
18
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Emina Bektas
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 7-6(1) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Eri Shimizu
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Lizette Cabrera
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Carol Zhao
67%
(
97 of
144)
1st Serve %
65%
(
93 of
143)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
13
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
93)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
56 of
143)
141
Total Points Won
146
|
7-6(8) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Loeb Vs Bektas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Loeb are available here and Bektas photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emina Bektas
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
